Schwenn v. S. Goldberg & Co.
220 A.2d 421, 91 N.J. Super. 346, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 327
Opinion
Judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Botter in the Law Division, 88 N. J. Super. 113 (1965).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schwenn v. S. Goldberg & Co., 220 A.2d 421, 91 N.J. Super. 346, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 327 (N.J. Ct. App. 1966).
220 A.2d 421 (Schwenn v. S. Goldberg & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dauer v. Pichowski
413 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Marshall
91 N.J. Super. 346 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)