Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.

Opinion

Case: 22-1951 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 10/11/2023

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, Appellant

v.

NEENAH, INC., Appellee ______________________

2022-1951, 2022-1952, 2022-1953 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020- 01361, IPR2020-01363, IPR2021-00016. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Padmanabhan & Dawson PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by MICHELLE DAWSON, BRITTA LOFTUS, PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT.

JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ Case: 22-1951 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 10/11/2023

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 11, 2023 Date