Schweit v. Harum Scarum Amusement Corp.

247 A.D. 755
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 247 A.D. 755 (Schweit v. Harum Scarum Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schweit v. Harum Scarum Amusement Corp., 247 A.D. 755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries to infant plaintiff, suffered while in a revolving barrel maintained for profit for amusement of defendant’s patrons, of whom infant plaintiff was one, and alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence, and by the father to recover for medical expenses. Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. It was error to nonsuit plaintiffs. Under the circumstances disclosed by this record, it was for the jury to determine whether, in the exercise of reasonable care, the defendant should have furnished an attendant to supervise the use of the barrel. (Rega v. Luna Amusement Co., 243 App. Div. 725; Maggio v. Board of Education, 219 id. 802.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levy v. Cascades Operating Corp.
176 Misc. 373 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)
Schubart v. Hotel Astor, Inc.
168 Misc. 431 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schweit-v-harum-scarum-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1936.