Schweim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schweim v. State

600 So. 2d 45, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7188, 1992 WL 134828

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1992

DocketNo. 91-02395

StatusPublished

This text of 600 So. 2d 45 (Schweim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schweim v. State, 600 So. 2d 45, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7188, 1992 WL 134828 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s judgment and sentence, including the imposition of court costs, is affirmed. We approve that portion of Condition Six of the appellant’s probation that states “You will not use any illegal drugs.” However, we direct that the remaining portion of Condition Six be stricken. See Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA [46]*461992); Alvarez v. State, 593 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s judgment and sentence, including the imposition of court costs, is affirmed. We approve that portion of Condition Six of the appellant’s probation that states “You will not use any illegal drugs.” However, we direct that the remaining portion of Condition Six be stricken. See Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA [46]*461992); Alvarez v. State, 593 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 So. 2d 45, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7188, 1992 WL 134828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schweim-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack