Schweig v. Waltzer
279 A.D. 1065, 113 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5852
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schweig v. Waltzer. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D. 990 →
Opinion
Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See ante, pp. 989, 990.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schweig v. Waltzer, 279 A.D. 1065, 113 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1065 (Schweig v. Waltzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.