Schwarz v. Robinson

129 A.D. 404, 113 N.Y.S. 995, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1309
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 129 A.D. 404 (Schwarz v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwarz v. Robinson, 129 A.D. 404, 113 N.Y.S. 995, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think that the plaintiff was entitled to examine the witness in relation to his knowledge as to the defendant Eobinson.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the order for examination reinstated; the time for the examination of the witness to be fixed on the settlement of the order to be entered hereon.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and order for examination reinstated. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tierney v. Flower
32 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
In Re Illidge
91 P.2d 1100 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)
Neugass v. Terminal Cab Corp.
139 Misc. 699 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Akhurst v. National Starch Co.
64 Misc. 445 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D. 404, 113 N.Y.S. 995, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwarz-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1908.