Schwarz v. Cooke

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schwarz v. Cooke

207 Ill. App. 310

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 2, 1917·No. Gen. No. 23,098·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Accord and satisfaction — what does not constitute. The settlement of an account for rent between a real estate firm acting as agent and a member thereof cannot be availed of as an accord and satisfaction between the landlord and tenant, since the defense of an accord and satisfaction, to be available, must be between the parties to the action and none other.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Accord and satisfaction — what does not constitute. The settlement of an account for rent between a real estate firm acting as agent and a member thereof cannot be availed of as an accord and satisfaction between the landlord and tenant, since the defense of an accord and satisfaction, to be available, must be between the parties to the action and none other.

Schwarz v. Cooke, 207 Ill. App. 310 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

207 Ill. App. 310 (Schwarz v. Cooke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related