Schwarz v. Cooke

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schwarz v. Cooke

207 Ill. App. 310

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 2, 1917

DocketGen. No. 23,098

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 Ill. App. 310 (Schwarz v. Cooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwarz v. Cooke, 207 Ill. App. 310 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Accord and satisfaction — what does not constitute. The settlement of an account for rent between a real estate firm acting as agent and a member thereof cannot be availed of as an accord and satisfaction between the landlord and tenant, since the defense of an accord and satisfaction, to be available, must be between the parties to the action and none other.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Accord and satisfaction — what does not constitute. The settlement of an account for rent between a real estate firm acting as agent and a member thereof cannot be availed of as an accord and satisfaction between the landlord and tenant, since the defense of an accord and satisfaction, to be available, must be between the parties to the action and none other.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 Ill. App. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwarz-v-cooke-illappct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack