Schwarz v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

14 Misc. 648
CourtNew York City Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Misc. 648 (Schwarz v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwarz v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 14 Misc. 648 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Per- Ouriam.

The verdict in this, case was' not against the weight, of evidence. Four'witnesses testified nr favor of the defendant as to what took place at the time of the collision. No exception was taken to the questions submitted to the jury, and counsel seem to -have agreed to^the theory of the case, adopted by the judge at the trial. No costs were imposed as a- condition of granting the new trial, and, therefore, we inay infer that the same was granted as matter of right, and not as matter of favor.

We have examined the' exceptions at folios. 47, 68, 83, 84, 88 .and 154, and do not find error, and conclude that the order granting a new; trial should be reversed, with costs.

Present-: Clement,'Ch. J., and Osborne, J..

Order reversed, with costs. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Misc. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwarz-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nycityct-1895.