Schwartzwald v. Oath Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 10, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-09938·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LAWRENCE SCHWARTZWALD, Plaintiff, -against- 19 CIVIL 9938 (RA) JUDGMENT OATH, INC., Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 10, 2020, the Court holds that Oath's use of the Photograph constituted fair use and grants Oath's motion to dismiss. As Schwartzwald . already amended his Complaint once in response to Oath's initial motion to dismiss and "in the absence of any indication that [he] could or would provide additional allegations that might lead to a different result," the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Gallop v. Cheney, 642 F.3d 364, 369 (2d Cir. 2011); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: AK Mango Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartzwald v. Oath Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Schwartzwald v. Oath Inc. (Schwartzwald v. Oath Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallop v. Cheney
642 F.3d 364 (Second Circuit, 2011)