Schwartzwaelder Co. v. Silverman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartzwaelder Co. v. Silverman

134 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 N.Y.S. 1114 (Schwartzwaelder Co. v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartzwaelder Co. v. Silverman, 134 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff, a foreign corporation, has recovered a judgment for goods sold and delivered against the defendant. It [1115]*1115appears from the evidence that the plaintiff was doing business in the state, and that it failed to file a certificate as required by section 15 of the General Corporation Law. Under these circumstances it was prohibited access to our courts, and its complaint should have been dismissed.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff, a foreign corporation, has recovered a judgment for goods sold and delivered against the defendant. It [1115]*1115appears from the evidence that the plaintiff was doing business in the state, and that it failed to file a certificate as required by section 15 of the General Corporation Law. Under these circumstances it was prohibited access to our courts, and its complaint should have been dismissed.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartzwaelder-co-v-silverman-nyappterm-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack