Schwartzenbach v. Antoine

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Schwartzenbach v. Antoine

105 A. 894, 93 N.J.L. 249, 8 Gummere 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 150

DecidedNovember 27, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 894 (Schwartzenbach v. Antoine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartzenbach v. Antoine, 105 A. 894, 93 N.J.L. 249, 8 Gummere 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 150 (N.J. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tlie question of the negligence of the appellant’s driver, and the question of the contributory negligence of the respondent’s decedent, were, each, of them, for the determination of the jury under the evidence submitted. The motions to nonsuit, and to direct a verdict for the defendant, were therefore properly refused.

The'judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Tlie question of the negligence of the appellant’s driver, and the question of the contributory negligence of the respondent’s decedent, were, each, of them, for the determination of the jury under the evidence submitted. The motions to nonsuit, and to direct a verdict for the defendant, were therefore properly refused.

The'judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A. 894, 93 N.J.L. 249, 8 Gummere 249, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartzenbach-v-antoine-nj-1918.