Schwartz v. William K.

1 Silv. Ct. App. 237, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 288
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 7, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Silv. Ct. App. 237 (Schwartz v. William K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. William K., 1 Silv. Ct. App. 237, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 288 (N.Y. 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the provisions of the Revised Statutes (3 R. S., [7th ed.] 2238, §§ 20, 21), the assignment of September 28, 1885, was void for the reason that it contained preferences. The assignment of October 1, 1885, was therefore valid. Upon this ground the order of the general term should be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Silv. Ct. App. 237, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-william-k-ny-1886.