Schwartz v. Union Central Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Union Central Life Insurance

257 A.D. 856, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8177

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 1939·Published

Opinion

Orders denying the motions of the defendants to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders denying the motions of the defendants to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Schwartz v. Union Central Life Insurance, 257 A.D. 856, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 856 (Schwartz v. Union Central Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.