Schwartz v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

221 A.D. 759

Opinion

Judgment dismissmg the complaint upon the merits reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary-judgment deMed, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that the complaint states a cause of action. There is nothing in the record to justify the conclusion, as matter of law, that plaintiff received title to all the property described in Ms agreement with the Flatlands Holding Corporation, and as shown upon the blue print. If there was negligence on the part of defendant, the principles of law enunciated in Ehmer v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (156 N. Y. 10) and Glyn v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. (132 App. Div. 859) apply, notwithstanding the [760]*760provisions of sections 270 and 280 of the Penal Law. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 221 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

221 A.D. 759 (Schwartz v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ehmer v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.
50 N.E. 420 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Glyn v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
132 A.D. 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)