Schwartz v. Sutton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schwartz v. Sutton

803 S.W.2d 195, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 219, 1991 WL 15421

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 1991

DocketNo. 58226

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 803 S.W.2d 195 (Schwartz v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Sutton, 803 S.W.2d 195, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 219, 1991 WL 15421 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in an action by plaintiff, the ex-wife of defendant, to collect reimbursement for payment of hospitalization and related doctor bills incurred when the parties’ son was hospitalized.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI