Schwartz v. State
This text of Schwartz v. State (Schwartz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000199 01-MAY-2014 12:34 PM
SCWC-10-0000199
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
SANDRA KAY SCHWARTZ, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-10-0000199; DC-S.P. NO. 10-1-0005; CASE NO. 2DTA-08-00292)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kim, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s application for writ
of certiorari, filed on March 17, 2014, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2014.
Hayden Aluli for /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Glenn J. Kim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schwartz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-state-haw-2014.