Schwartz v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schwartz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Haw. 258
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 1, 2014·No. SCWC-10-0000199·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-10-0000199

01-MAY-2014

12:34 PM

SCWC-10-0000199

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

SANDRA KAY SCHWARTZ,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-10-0000199; DC-S.P. NO. 10-1-0005; CASE NO. 2DTA-08-00292)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kim, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on March 17, 2014, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2014.

Hayden Aluli for /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Glenn J. Kim

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. State, (haw 2014).

Schwartz v. State (Schwartz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.