Schwartz v. Skinner

47 Cal. 3
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
DocketNo. 3,887
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 47 Cal. 3 (Schwartz v. Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Skinner, 47 Cal. 3 (Cal. 1873).

Opinion

By the Court :

The question presented by the record is, whether- the plaintiff, who is a tenant in common of personal property, can maintain this action—which is in form replevin—against the defendant, who is a cotenant, and who took possession of all the common property, and converted it to his own use. The defendant contends that this action cannot be maintained, but admits that trover will lie. The complaint contains all the allegations which are essential in trover, and those allegations are sustained by the findings. There is no room for implied findings, as it is stated in the findings that the "foregoing are all the facts in this case.”

The judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to render judgment for the plaintiff on the findings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodson v. County of Plumas
E.D. California, 2024
Halsey v. Simmons
166 P. 944 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Balch v. Jones
61 Cal. 234 (California Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Cal. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-skinner-cal-1873.