Schwartz v. Schwartz
This text of 36 Misc. 487 (Schwartz v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for a separation. The order of arrest was granted on the sole ground that the action is one to recover damages for a personal injury under section 549 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The basis of that section of the present Code is section 179 of the Code of Procedure. The language of section 549, relating to the right to arrest in actions for a personal injury, is substantially similar to the language used in section 179.
[488]*488Under the last named section it was held in the case of Jamieson v. Jamieson, 11 Hun, 38, that an action for separation on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment was an action for a personal injury and an order of arrest could be lawfully upheld therein.
If this were an open question I should be inclined to disagree with the reasoning of the court in the last named case, but I am constrained to follow the precedent established, and therefore the motion to vacate the order of arrest is denied, but the amount of the undertaking is reduced to $2,500.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Misc. 487, 73 N.Y.S. 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-schwartz-nysupct-1901.