Schwartz v. Schwartz

224 A.D.2d 189, 637 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 809

This text of 224 A.D.2d 189 (Schwartz v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Schwartz, 224 A.D.2d 189, 637 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered May 31, 1995, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss this action seeking to invalidate the parties’ foreign divorce, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs allegations are insufficiently particularized to support a claim that the parties’ Mexican divorce, obtained over 25 years ago, was the product of fraud, coercion, oppression, or was offensive to New York public policy (see, Matter of Gotlib v Ratsutsky, 83 NY2d 696). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gotlib v. Ratsutsky
635 N.E.2d 289 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 189, 637 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1996.