Schwartz v. Schreiber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Schreiber

13 A.D.2d 811, 216 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 811 (Schwartz v. Schreiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Schreiber, 13 A.D.2d 811, 216 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 10, 1960, denying a trial preference, pursuant to rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules; and (2) from so much of an order of said court, dated July 27, 1960, made upon reargument, as adheres to the original decision. Order, on reargument, insofar as it adheres to the original decision and denies the motion for a preference, reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Upon this record, it is our opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to the preference (Long v. Savino, 11 A D 2d 1051). Appeal from the original order dismissed as academic. This order was superseded by the later order granting reargument and adhering to the original decision. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 10, 1960, denying a trial preference, pursuant to rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules; and (2) from so much of an order of said court, dated July 27, 1960, made upon reargument, as adheres to the original decision. Order, on reargument, insofar as it adheres to the original decision and denies the motion for a preference, reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Upon this record, it is our opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to the preference (Long v. Savino, 11 A D 2d 1051). Appeal from the original order dismissed as academic. This order was superseded by the later order granting reargument and adhering to the original decision. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 811, 216 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-schreiber-nyappdiv-1961.