Schwartz v. Russell

Supreme Court of Florida

Schwartz v. Russell

88 So. 2d 615, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3840

DecidedJuly 13, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 2d 615 (Schwartz v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Russell, 88 So. 2d 615, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3840 (Fla. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motions of appellees, Lillian Siegel and Lake F. Russell, to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motions to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed,

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motions of appellees, Lillian Siegel and Lake F. Russell, to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motions to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed,

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 So. 2d 615, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-russell-fla-1956.