Schwartz v. Rice
683 N.E.2d 784, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 4023
This text of 683 N.E.2d 784 (Schwartz v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schwartz v. Rice, 683 N.E.2d 784, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 4023 (Ohio 1997).
Opinion
Stark App. Nos. 95CA338 and 96CA0145.
This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s [1479]*1479motion for stay of the court of appeals’ mandate,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of the court of appeals’ mandate be, and hereby is, denied, effective September 2,1997.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
683 N.E.2d 784, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 4023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-rice-ohio-1997.