Schwartz v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division

200 N.E.2d 642, 136 Ind. App. 338, 1964 Ind. App. LEXIS 182
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 20, 1964
DocketNo. 20,156
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 N.E.2d 642 (Schwartz v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, 200 N.E.2d 642, 136 Ind. App. 338, 1964 Ind. App. LEXIS 182 (Ind. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

Hunter, C. J.

This was a proceeding before the Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division to determine the eligibility of the claimant, the appellant Otto J. Schwartz, under the Indiana Employment Security Act.

The appeals referee and the Review Board, with one member dissenting affirmed the determination of the local deputy that the appellant is ineligible for benefits under the Indiana Employment Security Act.

This matter is before us on a petition to remand filed by the appellee Board of Review.

Upon an examination of said petition and transcript of the record in this cause, we find that the decision of the referee and the Review Board was predicated upon certain written instruments enumerated as follows:

(a) Agreement between Warner Gear Division, Borg-Warner Corp., Muncie, Indiana, and Local International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, A. F. L.- C. I. O., November 6, 1961. (Transcript, p. 33).
(b) Retirement Income Guide, Warner Gear Division, Borg-Warner Corporation, for Employees in the Bargaining Unit Represented by Local 287 Affiliated with UAW, AFL-CIO. (Transcript, p. 34).
(c) Retirement Income Guide, Warner Gear Division, Borg-Warner Corporation, for Employees in the Bargaining Unit Represented by Local 287 Affiliated with UAW, AFL-CIO (As Amended November 1, 1961). (Transcript, p. 35).

However, we find that said written instruments were never offered, admitted or placed in evidence before said referee or the Board. This Court stated in the case of Jung v. Review Board of Indiana Employ. [340]*340Sec. Div. (1964), 136 Ind. App. 248, 199 N. E. 2d 476 “. . . there must appear no possibility nor opportunity that evidence extraneous the record may serve as any part of the factual foundation upon which the conclusion and ultimate determination of the Board may be premised.”

It is now therefore ordered that this cause be remanded to the Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division for further hearing with instructions to entertain the introduction into evidence of said written instruments referred to herein.

Remanded.

Note.—Reported in 200 N. E. 2d 642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
211 N.E.2d 634 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.E.2d 642, 136 Ind. App. 338, 1964 Ind. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-review-board-of-indiana-employment-security-division-indctapp-1964.