Schwartz v. Regenstreif

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Regenstreif

26 A.D.2d 801, 274 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 801 (Schwartz v. Regenstreif) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Regenstreif, 26 A.D.2d 801, 274 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered February 4, 1966, denying appellant’s motion for judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a]), unanimously reversed on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant and the motion granted, with $10 costs, and complaint dismissed. Whatever may have been the rights of the respondent under the original agreement of November 1, 1961, the mutual release entered into between the parties on September 14, 1962 is a bar to the action brought by him. Motion for an order allowing order to show cause and exhibits to be considered as part of the record on appeal dismissed as moot. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Capozzoli and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered February 4, 1966, denying appellant’s motion for judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a]), unanimously reversed on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant and the motion granted, with $10 costs, and complaint dismissed. Whatever may have been the rights of the respondent under the original agreement of November 1, 1961, the mutual release entered into between the parties on September 14, 1962 is a bar to the action brought by him. Motion for an order allowing order to show cause and exhibits to be considered as part of the record on appeal dismissed as moot. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Capozzoli and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 801, 274 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-regenstreif-nyappdiv-1966.