Schwartz v. Regenstreif

227 N.E.2d 880, 19 N.Y.2d 882, 281 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1529
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 227 N.E.2d 880 (Schwartz v. Regenstreif) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Regenstreif, 227 N.E.2d 880, 19 N.Y.2d 882, 281 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1529 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Order reversed and that of Special Term reinstated, with costs in tMs court and in the Appellate Division, upon the ground that issues of fact are presented which require a trial.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.E.2d 880, 19 N.Y.2d 882, 281 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-regenstreif-ny-1967.