Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.

230 A.D. 792

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause,.,of action. (King v. King, 37 Misc. 63; Barkley v. Muller, 164 App. Div. 351.) Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in resulf.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause,.,of action. (King v. King, 37 Misc. 63; Barkley v. Muller, 164 App. Div. 351.) Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in resulf.,

Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp., 230 A.D. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

230 A.D. 792 (Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related