Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.

230 A.D. 792

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 792 (Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Partos Realty Corp., 230 A.D. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause,.,of action. (King v. King, 37 Misc. 63; Barkley v. Muller, 164 App. Div. 351.) Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in resulf.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause,.,of action. (King v. King, 37 Misc. 63; Barkley v. Muller, 164 App. Div. 351.) Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in resulf.,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-partos-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack