Schwartz v. Parker

17 Misc. 2d 951, 192 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4064
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 24, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is undisputed that the lease for the store space in question was executed in conformity with the provisions of section 8 (subd. [gg], par. [1]) of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). Upon the expiration of the term, such space was removed from the possessory protection theretofore afforded by the statute (Business Rent Law, § 12, as amd. by L. 1956, ch. 735, L. 1957, ch. 452).

The final order should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition, with appropriate costs in the court below. Issuance of warrant stayed until May 31, 1959, upon condition that tenant pay to landlord for use and occupation the same monthly rent as heretofore, in advance.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Benjamin, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Parker, 17 Misc. 2d 951, 192 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

17 Misc. 2d 951 (Schwartz v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joffe v. Drake Business School, Inc.
35 Misc. 2d 442 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)