Schwartz v. Olympic, Inc.

74 F. Supp. 800
CourtDistrict Court, D. Delaware
DecidedDecember 22, 1947
DocketCivil Action No. 1083
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 F. Supp. 800 (Schwartz v. Olympic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Olympic, Inc., 74 F. Supp. 800 (D. Del. 1947).

Opinion

LEAHY, District Judge.

This is a diversity case where plaintiff seeks to set aside a merger of two Delaware companies. Delaware law controls. Plaintiff is the alleged owner of unregistered shares. Under Delaware law, an unregistered stockholder cannot attack a merger. Salt Dome Oil Corporation v. Schenck, Del., 41 A.2d 583, 158 A.L.R. 975; Application of General Realty & Utilities Corporation, Del.Ch., 42 A.2d 24.

Plaintiff also seeks to amend his complaint to bring in other parties plaintiff. If he cannot maintain his own complaint, he has no right to amend it. The complaint should be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. the Olympic, Inc.
74 F. Supp. 800 (D. Delaware, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F. Supp. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-olympic-inc-ded-1947.