Schwartz v. Natwest Markets, PLC.

Second Circuit

Schwartz v. Natwest Markets, PLC.

40 F. App'x 634

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 17, 2002

DocketNos. 01-9153(L), 01-9176(XAP)

StatusPublished

This text of 40 F. App'x 634 (Schwartz v. Natwest Markets, PLC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Natwest Markets, PLC., 40 F. App'x 634 (2d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

[635]*635Plaintiff-appellant Mark Schwartz appeals from that part of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, Judge), dated September 6, 2001, which dismissed one of his breach of contract claims against Defendant Appel-lee NatWest Markets, PLC. NatWest has abandoned its appeal from another part of the judgement.

The parties’ dispute on appeal centers on whether plaintiff was properly terminated for “cause” according to the terms of their employment agreement. The district court’s factual findings have not been disputed on appeal, and we agree with both the district court’s legal analysis and its application of the law to the facts. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons as set forth in the opinion below, we AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

[635]*635Plaintiff-appellant Mark Schwartz appeals from that part of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, Judge), dated September 6, 2001, which dismissed one of his breach of contract claims against Defendant Appel-lee NatWest Markets, PLC. NatWest has abandoned its appeal from another part of the judgement.

The parties’ dispute on appeal centers on whether plaintiff was properly terminated for “cause” according to the terms of their employment agreement. The district court’s factual findings have not been disputed on appeal, and we agree with both the district court’s legal analysis and its application of the law to the facts. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons as set forth in the opinion below, we AFFIRM.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 F. App'x 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-natwest-markets-plc-ca2-2002.