Home/California Supreme Court/Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.

285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 779, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 554
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1930
DocketDocket No. S.F. 13706.
StatusPublished

This text of 285 P. 698 (Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A., 285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 779, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 554 (Cal. 1930).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [282 P. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L.A. No. 11849),ante, p. 52 [285 P. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.
285 P. 696 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Hansen v. Municipal Court
282 P. 384 (California Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 779, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-municipal-ct-city-la-cal-1930.