Home/California Supreme Court/Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.

285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 779, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 554
California Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 1930·No. Docket No. S.F. 13706.·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [282 P. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L.A. No. 11849),ante, p. 52 [285 P. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A., 285 P. 698, 209 Cal. 779, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 554 (Cal. 1930).

285 P. 698 (Schwartz v. Municipal Ct., City, L.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.
285 P. 696 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Hansen v. Municipal Court
282 P. 384 (California Supreme Court, 1929)