Schwartz v. Morse Business Machines Corp.

49 A.D.3d 857, 853 N.Y.2d 887

This text of 49 A.D.3d 857 (Schwartz v. Morse Business Machines Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Morse Business Machines Corp., 49 A.D.3d 857, 853 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The defendants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Accordingly, that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]).

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 857, 853 N.Y.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-morse-business-machines-corp-nyappdiv-2008.