Schwartz v. Marks

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Marks

52 Misc. 109, 101 N.Y.S. 792

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 52 Misc. 109 (Schwartz v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Marks, 52 Misc. 109, 101 N.Y.S. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in his favor against the defendants. The action was brought for the recovery of $124.96 as damages for the conversion of 104 window sashes. The court rendered judgment in the following terms: “ Plaintiff to have possession of the property, or defendants to.pay plaintiff $124.96 damages, $3 costs, $2.72 prospective costs, and $15 extra costs, making a total of $145.68.” The conversion of the property and the damages were proved, and the plaintiff was entitled to a money judgment simply for $124.96 and the proper costs.

The judgment is reversed and judgment is directed for plaintiff for the sum of $124.96, together with three dollars costs and two dollars and seventy-two cents prospective costs and the costs of this appeal.

Present: Gildeesleeve, Fitzgebald and Davis, JJ.

Judgment reversed and judgment directed for plaintiff for $124.96 together with three dollars costs and two dollars and seventy-two cents prospective costs and costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in his favor against the defendants. The action was brought for the recovery of $124.96 as damages for the conversion of 104 window sashes. The court rendered judgment in the following terms: “ Plaintiff to have possession of the property, or defendants to.pay plaintiff $124.96 damages, $3 costs, $2.72 prospective costs, and $15 extra costs, making a total of $145.68.” The conversion of the property and the damages were proved, and the plaintiff was entitled to a money judgment simply for $124.96 and the proper costs.

The judgment is reversed and judgment is directed for plaintiff for the sum of $124.96, together with three dollars costs and two dollars and seventy-two cents prospective costs and the costs of this appeal.

Present: Gildeesleeve, Fitzgebald and Davis, JJ.

Judgment reversed and judgment directed for plaintiff for $124.96 together with three dollars costs and two dollars and seventy-two cents prospective costs and costs of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Misc. 109, 101 N.Y.S. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-marks-nyappterm-1906.