Schwartz v. Lippman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Lippman

124 A.D. 935, 109 N.Y.S. 1146

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D. 935 (Schwartz v. Lippman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Lippman, 124 A.D. 935, 109 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs-arid disbursements, upon the ground that the order was entered upon the motion of the plaintiff; hut without prejudice to a motion for a resettlement of the order, or for a renewal of the application for a bill of particulars at the Special Term on proper papers. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Appeal dismissed, with, ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs-arid disbursements, upon the ground that the order was entered upon the motion of the plaintiff; hut without prejudice to a motion for a resettlement of the order, or for a renewal of the application for a bill of particulars at the Special Term on proper papers. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Appeal dismissed, with, ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D. 935, 109 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-lippman-nyappdiv-1908.