Schwartz v. Kleber

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Schwartz v. Kleber

7 A. 209, 4 Sadler 300, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 920

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 15, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A. 209 (Schwartz v. Kleber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Kleber, 7 A. 209, 4 Sadler 300, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 920 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The terretenant had no standing to defend. The mortgage was good for the interest of Johanna Foerester, whatever that might be; and so far as the present case is concerned her title is perfect, not having yet been impeached by her husband’s creditors. The sale in bankruptcy of this property, as the property of Edward Foerester, could not affect her right in the least, and conse^ quently could not devest the lien of the mortgage.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The terretenant had no standing to defend. The mortgage was good for the interest of Johanna Foerester, whatever that might be; and so far as the present case is concerned her title is perfect, not having yet been impeached by her husband’s creditors. The sale in bankruptcy of this property, as the property of Edward Foerester, could not affect her right in the least, and conse^ quently could not devest the lien of the mortgage.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A. 209, 4 Sadler 300, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-kleber-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack