Schwartz v. Kleber

7 A. 209, 4 Sadler 300, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 920
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The terretenant had no standing to defend. The mortgage was good for the interest of Johanna Foerester, whatever that might be; and so far as the present case is concerned her title is perfect, not having yet been impeached by her husband’s creditors. The sale in bankruptcy of this property, as the property of Edward Foerester, could not affect her right in the least, and conse^ quently could not devest the lien of the mortgage.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Kleber, 7 A. 209, 4 Sadler 300, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 920 (Pa. 1886).

7 A. 209 (Schwartz v. Kleber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moreau v. Dumagene
20 La. 230 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1868)