Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Co.

159 A.D. 937, 145 N.Y.S. 1144

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D. 937 (Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Hooker Electro-Chemical Co., 159 A.D. 937, 145 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified.so as to permit plaintiff to have an inspection of the machine on which he was injured, and its several parts, on condi[938]*938tion that plaintiff pay to defendant the expense of employing a machinist from the shops where said machine was made, to take down the machine and, after the inspection, to set it up again; also modified as to provisions as to photographs and models; and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Foote on two days’ notice. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified.so as to permit plaintiff to have an inspection of the machine on which he was injured, and its several parts, on condi[938]*938tion that plaintiff pay to defendant the expense of employing a machinist from the shops where said machine was made, to take down the machine and, after the inspection, to set it up again; also modified as to provisions as to photographs and models; and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Foote on two days’ notice. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D. 937, 145 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-hooker-electro-chemical-co-nyappdiv-1913.