Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.

190 N.E.2d 253, 12 N.Y.2d 1073
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1963·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the Statute of Limitations commenced to run in 1957, when he first was able to discover an injury caused by a 1944 injection of a carcinogenic substance, and that a holding by this court as a matter of law that the actionable injury was sustained prior to that time would deprive appellant of due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeals held that in an action for personal injuries caused by negligence the cause of action accrues and the Statute of Limitations commences to run when the negligence produces injury, and that the injury occurred when the harmful substance first acted upon appellant’s body, at or about the time of injection in 1944, appellant’s lack of knowledge notwithstanding. [See 12 N Y 2d 212.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp., 190 N.E.2d 253, 12 N.Y.2d 1073 (N.Y. 1963).

190 N.E.2d 253 (Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miniero v. City of New York
15 Misc. 3d 432 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Barresi v. State
232 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
657 N.E.2d 1301 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.
615 N.E.2d 999 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Admire Bank & Trust v. City of Emporia
829 P.2d 578 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1992)
Cranesville Block Co. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
175 A.D.2d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Tomlinson v. Celotex Corp.
770 P.2d 825 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1989)
Fleishman v. Lilly
467 N.E.2d 517 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Johnson v. Eli Lilly and Co.
577 F. Supp. 174 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'n
631 P.2d 222 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1981)
Rockwell v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Co.
510 F. Supp. 266 (N.D. New York, 1981)
Muller v. Sturman
79 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Piracci Construction Co. v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
490 F. Supp. 314 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Clark v. United States
481 F. Supp. 1086 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Schulman Investment Co. v. Olin Corp.
477 F. Supp. 623 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa Barbara
440 F. Supp. 1088 (N.D. New York, 1977)
Paul v. State
88 Misc. 2d 972 (New York State Court of Claims, 1976)