Schwartz v. Greenbaum
This text of 221 S.E.2d 61 (Schwartz v. Greenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal involves a question of whether in a claim for workmen’s compensation the employee (appellant) gave notice to his employer (appellee) of an injury suffered in the course of his employment. Held:
The only evidence submitted to the deputy director (and subsequently to the full board) which remotely approaches the question as to whether the claimant had given his employer notice of an injury related to and occurring on the job was the following: "... I was out [of the hospital] two days and I called Mr. Jackson [the employee’s supervisor] during those two days, assuming I [260]*260would go back to work because I had never been out of work . .
The trial judge reversed the finding of fact by the board that this testimony was sufficient to show the giving of notice of the injury to the employer. We agree with the trial judge that the evidence was insufficient and affirm his reversal action. Royal Indem. Co. v. Coulter, 213 Ga. 277 (98 SE2d 899).
In view of our disposition, the remaining enumeration is rendered nugatory.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 S.E.2d 61, 136 Ga. App. 259, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-greenbaum-gactapp-1975.