Schwartz v. Frieder
This text of 249 A.D. 199 (Schwartz v. Frieder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order and judgment appealed from were granted because the second defense pleaded was deemed sufficient. It is to the effect that the services rendered by the plaintiff were of such a character as to require him to be possessed of a real estate brokerage license. (Real Prop. Law, § 440-a.) The view thus [200]*200adopted was erroneous. The complaint and papers submitted in opposition to defendants’ motion present an issue as to whether the services were not those of a business broker rather than a real estate broker, within the rule of Weingast v. Rialto Pastry Shop, Inc. (243 N. Y. 113).
It follows, therefore, that the order and judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Cohn, JJ.
Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 199, 291 N.Y.S. 836, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-frieder-nyappdiv-1936.