Schwartz v. Felton
This text of 173 A.D.2d 600 (Schwartz v. Felton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant Sutton & Towne Suburban, Inc., from a resettled order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), entered October 26, 1989.
Ordered that the resettled order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice O’Shaughnessy at the Supreme Court in his decision dated August 31, 1989.
We further note that the appellant’s claim that res judicata or collateral estoppel bars adjudication of the issue raised by the plaintiff is without merit. Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D.2d 600, 571 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-felton-nyappdiv-1991.