Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1450

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 26, 2013

Docket2013-1955

StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 702 (Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1450 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2013-608.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01(E).

The appellants in this case shall file a brief within 40 days of the date of this entry, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. 16.02 through 16.07. As provided in S.Ct. Prac.R. 16.07, the court may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to timely file merit briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2013-608.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01(E).

The appellants in this case shall file a brief within 40 days of the date of this entry, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. 16.02 through 16.07. As provided in S.Ct. Prac.R. 16.07, the court may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to timely file merit briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-revision-ohio-2013.