Schwartz v. Custom Printing Co.
24 S.W.3d 718, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1, 2000 WL 2631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schwartz v. Custom Printing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 857 →
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Jack J. Schwartz appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of Respondent Custom Printing Co. in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and conclude [719]*719that an extended opinion would serve no precedential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schwartz v. Custom Printing Co., 24 S.W.3d 718, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1, 2000 WL 2631 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
24 S.W.3d 718 (Schwartz v. Custom Printing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.