Schwartz v. Cuba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Cuba

16 A.D.2d 659, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 659 (Schwartz v. Cuba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Cuba, 16 A.D.2d 659, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action under section 977-b of the Civil Practice Act to obtain the appointment of a permanent receiver of the New York assets of the defendant, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Cuba, in which a temporary receiver has been appointed pursuant to said section, the said corporation appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 16, 1961, as granted the motion of the temporary receiver to the extent of authorizing him to pay out of the funds in his possession certain expenses, set forth in a Schedule “ A ”, attached to the moving papers, in the aggregate amount of $595.37. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent Sabbatino, as temporary receiver (cf. Meltzer v. Grazi, 10 A D 2d 869, appeal dismissed, 8 N Y 2d 911). We have previously determined appeals from other orders in this action (Schwartz v. Campania Azucarera, 12 A D 2d 506; 14 A D 2d 582). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action under section 977-b of the Civil Practice Act to obtain the appointment of a permanent receiver of the New York assets of the defendant, a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Cuba, in which a temporary receiver has been appointed pursuant to said section, the said corporation appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 16, 1961, as granted the motion of the temporary receiver to the extent of authorizing him to pay out of the funds in his possession certain expenses, set forth in a Schedule “ A ”, attached to the moving papers, in the aggregate amount of $595.37. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent Sabbatino, as temporary receiver (cf. Meltzer v. Grazi, 10 A D 2d 869, appeal dismissed, 8 N Y 2d 911). We have previously determined appeals from other orders in this action (Schwartz v. Campania Azucarera, 12 A D 2d 506; 14 A D 2d 582). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 659, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-cuba-nyappdiv-1962.