Schwartz v. Bruder

New York Surrogate's Court

Schwartz v. Bruder

6 Dem. Sur. 169

DecidedJune 15, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Dem. Sur. 169 (Schwartz v. Bruder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Bruder, 6 Dem. Sur. 169 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

The Surrogate.

In this proceeding I am required to pass upon the validity of the following clause of [171]*171the will of decedent: “ I hereby direct that my executor hereinafter named to have masses read for the repose of my soul for which I direct him to expend the sum of five hundred dollars.” I am constrained by the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Holland v. Alcock (108 N. Y., 312) to determine this disposition to be invalid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Surrogate.

In this proceeding I am required to pass upon the validity of the following clause of [171]*171the will of decedent: “ I hereby direct that my executor hereinafter named to have masses read for the repose of my soul for which I direct him to expend the sum of five hundred dollars.” I am constrained by the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Holland v. Alcock (108 N. Y., 312) to determine this disposition to be invalid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Dem. Sur. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-bruder-nysurct-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack