Schwartz v. Bleu Evolution Bar & Restaurant Corp.

90 A.D.3d 488, 935 N.Y.2d 10
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 2011·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff tripped and fell when her foot got caught in a gap between two sidewalk flags. The gap was approximately one-half-inch wide and the height differential between the flags was also approximately one-half inch. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment based on plaintiffs theory of how the accident occurred. The gap between the flags and the height differential was trivial and plaintiff has not come forward with evidence to show that the defect presented a significant hazard despite being de minimis (see Gaud v Markham, 307 AD2d 845, 846 [2003], citing Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977-978 [1997]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, DeGrasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2011 NY Slip Op 30938(11).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwartz v. Bleu Evolution Bar & Restaurant Corp., 90 A.D.3d 488, 935 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 488 (Schwartz v. Bleu Evolution Bar & Restaurant Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danlasky v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.
2026 NY Slip Op 30933(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Marks v. 79th St. Tenants Corp.
2021 NY Slip Op 00629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Hutchinson v. Sheridan Hill House Corp.
110 A.D.3d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Boynton v. Haru Sake Bar
107 A.D.3d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Gomez v. Congregation K'Hal Adath Jeshurun, Inc.
104 A.D.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Castro v. City of New York
101 A.D.3d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)