Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.

E.D. New York

Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided July 2, 2025·No. 2:19-cv-07096·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK nn □□□ nn enn ee nenen K RUDOLPH SCHWARTZ, : Plaintiff, : v. : ORDER : 19-CV-7096 (WFK) (JAM) AMF BOWLING CENTER, INC., : Defendant. nn ene ne ne eee eee eee nemennmenee KH WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: On June 16, 2025, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss the above-captioned action without prejudice. See ECF Nos. 46, 50. That same day, the Court scheduled a hearing for Tuesday, July 1, 2025, regarding whether to adopt the R&R. See ECF No. 51. The parties did not file any objections to the R&R, which were due by Monday, June 30, 2025. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). And Plaintiff did not appear at the hearing to discuss the R&R held on Tuesday, July 1, 2025. The Court reviews an R&R for clear error when no objections have been filed. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). Having found no such error here, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety and DISMISSES the above-captioned action without prejudice. sootieren. YI

s-WFK —“HON. WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 2, 2025 Brooklyn, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK nn □□□ nn enn ee nenen K RUDOLPH SCHWARTZ, : Plaintiff, : v. : ORDER : 19-CV-7096 (WFK) (JAM) AMF BOWLING CENTER, INC., : Defendant. nn ene ne ne eee eee eee nemennmenee KH WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: On June 16, 2025, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss the above-captioned action without prejudice. See ECF Nos. 46, 50. That same day, the Court scheduled a hearing for Tuesday, July 1, 2025, regarding whether to adopt the R&R. See ECF No. 51. The parties did not file any objections to the R&R, which were due by Monday, June 30, 2025. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). And Plaintiff did not appear at the hearing to discuss the R&R held on Tuesday, July 1, 2025. The Court reviews an R&R for clear error when no objections have been filed. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (Garaufis, J.). Having found no such error here, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety and DISMISSES the above-captioned action without prejudice. sootieren. YI

s-WFK —“HON. WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 2, 2025 Brooklyn, New York

Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., (E.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. (Schwartz v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related