Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration
53 So. 3d 1140, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 321823
Opinion
See Toth v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 895 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“In order to obtain review of the action of an administrative agency, a person’s ‘substantial interests’ must have been determined”); Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua County, 719 So.2d 360, 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (“The allegations of the petition must be examined to determine whether the facts alleged amount to an injury ‘under the protection of pertinent substantive law”).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 53 So. 3d 1140, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 321823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
53 So. 3d 1140 (Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua County
719 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Toth v. South Florida Water Management District
895 So. 2d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)