Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration

Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration

53 So. 3d 1140, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 321823
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 2011
Docket1D10-2684
StatusPublished

This text of 53 So. 3d 1140 (Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Agency for Health Care Administration, 53 So. 3d 1140, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 321823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Toth v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 895 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“In order to obtain review of the action of an administrative agency, a person’s ‘substantial interests’ must have been determined”); Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua County, 719 So.2d 360, 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (“The allegations of the petition must be examined to determine whether the facts alleged amount to an injury ‘under the protection of pertinent substantive law”).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, HAWKES and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua County
719 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Toth v. South Florida Water Management District
895 So. 2d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 So. 3d 1140, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1066, 2011 WL 321823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-agency-for-health-care-administration-fladistctapp-2011.