Schwartz v. Acme Laundry Machinery Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Acme Laundry Machinery Corp.

271 A.D.2d 798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 798 (Schwartz v. Acme Laundry Machinery Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Acme Laundry Machinery Corp., 271 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff, [799]*799an independent contractor, visited a building owned by defendant Crib Diaper Service of Long Island, Inc., for the purpose of making an. inspection of the roof in order to make an estimate of the cost of repairs. While ascending a ladder to a. scuttle in the roof, the ladder gave away, and plaintiff fell and suffered injuries. The action is under subdivision 1 of section 240 of the Labor Law. Judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ. [See post, p. 827.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff, [799]*799an independent contractor, visited a building owned by defendant Crib Diaper Service of Long Island, Inc., for the purpose of making an. inspection of the roof in order to make an estimate of the cost of repairs. While ascending a ladder to a. scuttle in the roof, the ladder gave away, and plaintiff fell and suffered injuries. The action is under subdivision 1 of section 240 of the Labor Law. Judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ. [See post, p. 827.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-acme-laundry-machinery-corp-nyappdiv-1946.