Schwartz Tire Corp. v. Gershon

160 Misc. 439, 290 N.Y.S. 63, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1269
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 160 Misc. 439 (Schwartz Tire Corp. v. Gershon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz Tire Corp. v. Gershon, 160 Misc. 439, 290 N.Y.S. 63, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1269 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1936).

Opinion

Evans, J.

This is an application to compel the debtor to pay a judgment, in installments, under section 793 of the Civil Practice Act. The only basis for the order sought is that, at Special Term, after motion made and granted, on default, the debtor’s salary was fixed at sixty dollars weekly. For that reason, solely, the creditor asks the court to order the debtor to pay six dollars weekly. The order fixing the salary at sixty dollars was made on representation to the court that the debtor was president of a corporation, for which he performed services presumably of the value of sixty dollars weekly. The moving papers say that the debtor was examined in supplementary proceedings, but nothing is indicated as to the facts elicited, during the examination, as to the debtor’s income, necessary expenditures or obligations. I am unable to make an order under section 793 of the Civil Practice Act, solely upon the ground that another justice granted a motion to fix the judgment debtor’s salary.

The fixation of a salary will permit the issuance of a garnishee order and, if the garnishee order be not honored, the creditor may [440]*440bring suit to determine and collect the reasonable weekly salary against the employer. (Diamond v. Schulte Bakers, Inc., 136 Misc. 195.) Such a fixation of salary obviously is for the purpose of proceeding by way of garnishee. An order under section 793 of the Civil Practice Act must be made upon different considerations. The court is obliged to inquire not only as to the income of the debtor, but as to his necessary expenditures and obligations. There is not a sufficient showing in the moving papers to warrant the courf in making an order. Motion denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Szigyarto v. Szigyarto
475 N.E.2d 777 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Zig v. Zig
116 Misc. 2d 742 (New York Family Court, 1982)
In re the Estate Ostergren
49 Misc. 2d 894 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1966)
Gill v. Schwartz
273 A.D. 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Kells v. Stupplebeen
171 Misc. 987 (Columbia County Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 Misc. 439, 290 N.Y.S. 63, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-tire-corp-v-gershon-nynyccityct-1936.