Schwartz, Ex Parte Juan Antonio
This text of Schwartz, Ex Parte Juan Antonio (Schwartz, Ex Parte Juan Antonio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-75,973
EX PARTE JUAN ANTONIO SCHWARTZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-9900557-PR IN THE 265 TH ISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
robbery and sentenced to seventy-five years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that his judgment incorrectly reflects that a $1000 fine was assessed.
The trial court found that a fine was imposed when Applicant was initially placed on deferred
adjudication community supervision, but the trial court did not verbally indicate that a fine would
be imposed when he assessed punishment after Applicant’s community supervision was LAURY - 2
subsequently revoked. The judgment reflects that a $1000 fine was assessed. Applicant is entitled
to relief. Taylor v. State, 131 S.W.3d 530 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. F-9900557-PR in the 265th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County is reformed to delete reference to a fine being imposed. Applicant’s other
grounds are denied.
Delivered: August 20, 2008 Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schwartz, Ex Parte Juan Antonio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-ex-parte-juan-antonio-texcrimapp-2008.