Schwanke v. Berghauer

New York Court of Appeals

Schwanke v. Berghauer

432 N.E.2d 796, 55 N.Y.2d 863, 447 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3082

DecidedJanuary 19, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 432 N.E.2d 796 (Schwanke v. Berghauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwanke v. Berghauer, 432 N.E.2d 796, 55 N.Y.2d 863, 447 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3082 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. In view of the trial court’s factual findings, which were affirmed by the Appellate Division, we agree that plaintiffs are not entitled to recover compensation from defendants for their claimed losses on any of the theories presented.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. In view of the trial court’s factual findings, which were affirmed by the Appellate Division, we agree that plaintiffs are not entitled to recover compensation from defendants for their claimed losses on any of the theories presented.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 N.E.2d 796, 55 N.Y.2d 863, 447 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwanke-v-berghauer-ny-1982.